Comments for Rice Speir https://ricespeir.co.nz Alternative Legal Thinking Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:29:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.4 Comment on If you snooze, you lose – prosecuting under the Building Act 2004 by Nathan Speir https://ricespeir.co.nz/if-you-snooze-you-lose-prosecuting-under-the-building-act-2004/#comment-93 Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:29:15 +0000 https://ricespeir.co.nz/?p=5228#comment-93 Hi Bushy
Great to hear from you and we’re glad you found the article interesting. Where possible we try and keep our articles free of legalese but you are absolutely correct, section 378 of the Building Act 2004 is the relevant section. Interestingly, the same principles apply to prosecutions under the Resource Management Act 1991, see section 338(4).
Thanks for the feedback.

]]>
Comment on If you snooze, you lose – prosecuting under the Building Act 2004 by Bushy Bester https://ricespeir.co.nz/if-you-snooze-you-lose-prosecuting-under-the-building-act-2004/#comment-76 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 20:34:53 +0000 https://ricespeir.co.nz/?p=5228#comment-76 Thanks and an interesting read. It would have been great if you could have quoted the specifics of the legislation that refers the the time period. Here I assume you would have been referring to: Section 378 Time limit for filing charging document, correct???
Thanks Bushy

]]>