“Chopper” the rottweiler

High Court confirms it is the dog owner’s behavior, not the victim’s, that was under scrutiny in serious attack

After a short hearing in the High Court yesterday, Justice Brewer agreed with Jodi Libbey, appearing for Tauranga City Council, that it was the dog owner’s behavior and not the victim’s that was under scrutiny after Chopper the 50kg rottweiler seriously attacked a vet and broke her arm.

In convicting the dog owner and remitting the case back for sentencing, the Judge succinctly said that “[the dog owner] could have taken two simple steps.  She could have kept Chopper in the car.  Or, and this might not have been enough, she could have kept physical control of Chopper herself rather than leaving the dog with her 13 year old son.”

This case has attracted a lot of attention in the past year and provides a useful reminder of the obligations that dog owners have.

For any of council clients interested, the decision of Tauranga City Council v Fraser [2023] NZHC 723 can be downloaded from our website here.

Related news

Auckland’s ‘Housing Acceleration Fund’ finalised

Housing Acceleration Fund – Auckland Council group and Kāinga Ora infrastructure funding structure finalised Cori Barkle, Rice Speir’s specialist Property and Infrastructure Funding Director, recently played a pivotal role in finalising a long-term relationship and infrastructure funding arrangement between MHUD, Kāinga Ora and Auckland Council’s infrastructure asset owners (Auckland Transport, Healthy Waters, Community Facilities and…

What ‘adequate’ provision to protect the land really means

Recent determination by MBIE considers What ‘adequate’ provision to protect the land really means  In a recent Determination 024/025, MBIE considered Wellington City Council’s decision to grant a building consent for a large mixed-use development subject to s 72 of the Building Act 2004. Key findings The determination provides a helpful summary of the natural…

The role of local authorities in judicial reviews

The role of local authorities in judicial reviews of its consenting functions under the RMA Traditionally, decision-makers under the RMA haven’t followed the conventional approach and have instead played an active role in defending decisions that are subject to judicial review.  However, the appropriateness of this approach has recently been the subject of judicial commentary…