Alcohol LAPse (pun intended)

Of the 33 provisional local alcohol policies (LAPs) developed since 2017, 32 have been appealed, with the average duration from notification of a provisional LAP to adoption being 790 days!

Because of the time and costs involved in fighting these appeals, many councils (representing over 50% of New Zealand’s population) have halted or abandoned the implementation of LAPs.

To tackle this issue, the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Community Participation) Amendment Act 2023 (Act) has amended the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 (SASAA) which received Royal assent on 30 August 2023.

As the name of the Act suggests, other amendments have been incorporated to increase community participation.

What are LAPs?

A LAP is the tool councils develop and introduce to address local licensing issues by regulating the number, location, trading hours and licence conditions of licensed premises.

LAPs under SASAA

To develop LAPs under SASAA, councils were required to give public notice of a provisional LAP (which would attract appeals) and public notice of an adopted LAP once appeals had been determined.  As this was costly and time consuming, some councils abandoned the process, leaving the “local” out of an important aspect of their licensing regime.

Removal of people’s ability to appeal provisional LAPs

By removing the ability to appeal provisional LAPs, the process of developing LAPs will be much simpler and more cost effective.  Although this right of appeal is removed, the community can still have their say by:

  • Participating through councils’ special consultative procedures (through which LAPs are created); and/or
  • Judicially reviewing a council decision.

Anybody (except trade competitors) can object to alcohol applications

The SASAA requirement of demonstrating that you have a “greater interest than the public generally” is removed by the Act, which now allows anyone except for trade competitors, to object to a new or renewal application, provided any objection is:

  • Filed within 25 working days (an increase from 15 working days under SASAA); and
  • Based on the criteria with the SASAA.

What will change from May 2024?

First, the Act will require DLCs to establish procedures on how hearings are run, ensuring that the procedures:

  • Avoid unnecessary formality;
  • Do not permit cross-examination; and
  • Incorporate tikanga Māori, including evidence to be heard in te reo Māori.

Secondly, the Act provides for hearings to be conducted virtually.  While this does not necessarily require DLCs to conduct every hearing virtually, they are required to consider any reasonable requests from parties to attend hearings remotely.

What does this mean for councils?

The good news is that there’s still plenty of time for the councils to prepare and adapt to these changes, so get in touch with us if you require assistance.

Related news

30 years on – What does the 2025 revamp of the Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines mean for local authorities?

30 years on – What does the 2025 revamp of the Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines mean for local authorities? Overview The Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines are fundamental in shaping Aotearoa’s criminal justice system, and they have recently been updated following the most comprehensive review in over 30 years. While the definition of “prosecuting agency” excludes local authorities,…

Reserves valuations – Trash or Treasure?

For those who have been involved in the process of valuing a reserve, whether for disposal or exchange, you will appreciate the challenge often faced.  How do you value a reserve, whether it be open space for passive recreation or developed with a playground or sports field, that services the community and has been set…

Court rejects ‘total absence of fault’ defence following serious injury to young child

Court rejects ‘total absence of fault’ defence following serious injury to young child Background The defendant’s dog, a male American Pitbull-cross, attacked a young child visiting her property.  The victim suffered serious injuries, including wounds around her eye from a dog bite to the face.  The defendant was charged under s 58 of the Dog…