Building Act potpourri

Rice Speir regularly fields questions from local government clients about the day to day application of the Building Act and Building Code. Here are a few issues that we have dealt with recently that may be of interest.

Pre-fabricated buildings

We have recently dealt with the issue of pre-fabricated buildings constructed overseas, then placed on site in New Zealand. Technically, the pre-fabricated buildings do not require a building consent. The simple reason is that building work undertaken overseas is not subject to the Building Act. There is no authority for a council to compel an application for a building consent in this situation, which would then allow a council to satisfy itself that the prefabricated structure is code compliant.

The use of pre-fabricated structures is becoming increasingly common, which we understand may not be particularly satisfactory to councils as there is no certainty around the compliance of the pre-fabricated structures with the Code. We are currently looking to clarify exactly what a council can do to ensure a building pre-fabricated overseas complies with the Code, absent an application for building consent. Please contact us if you would like more information.

Residential Driveways

We have recently examined the issue of whether residential driveways need to comply with clause D1 of the Code. The confusion about whether clause D1 applies may arise from the similarity of the terms “access route” and “accessible route” referred to in the clause.

In our view, clause D1 applies to residential driveways, but a lack of clarity in the Building Code suggests that this issue is a good one to be determined by MBIE. Based on the advice of an expert traffic engineer, we have formed the view that driveways fall within the natural meaning of “construction edge” referred to in clause D1 and “structure” in the Building Act. Our view is that driveways do form part of an “access route”. We have not seen any references that indicate domestic driveways are exempt from this, and the Code appears to cover residential vehicle area developments. If you have any thoughts on this issue, please let us know.

Second “kitchens”

Our local government clients are increasingly seeing construction jobs where one room is set up to accommodate a second kitchen, but that second kitchen is not fully plumbed and operable. That room may, for example, have cabinetry, benchtops and spaces that will fit a fridge, oven or microwave. This would allow the future owner to easily convert the room into a second kitchen. A second kitchen would need a different building consent (and often, a resource consent and separate development contribution), but there is commonly uncertainty about whether or not the space constitutes a “kitchen” before it is fully completed. This in turns raises the issue of what the appropriate response should be when an application for Code Compliance Certificate is received.

By way of example, we recently advised on a situation where the homeowners had installed cabinetry and a bench, without a sink, as part of otherwise consented renovations. The space did not (yet) have any plumbed connections. It was clear that the intention was to use the space as a second operational kitchen at some point, and the property was marketed as having the potential to accommodate separate families in future.

The right call for a council in this type of situation will be fact specific. In each case, it will be important to consider exactly what fixtures are currently in place (for example sinks, drainage, plumbing and appliances), what the space is intended to be used for, and whether what is built complies with the consented plans. It will often be a finely balanced issue, which we would be happy to work through with you.

Related news

Not above the law: options when faced with a sovereign citizen

As local councils across New Zealand carry out their statutory duties under the Building Act 2004, a growing challenge has emerged in the form of “sovereign citizens.” These individuals typically attempt to deny the legitimacy of government authority and may attempt to frustrate compliance processes—including by refusing entry to property, rejecting compliance action, or disputing…

Natural Hazard Information: what’s changing for LIMs in 2025

Natural hazards are a topical issue, and big changes are on the horizon for how hazard information is communicated in Land Information Memoranda (LIMs). From 1 July 2025, the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Amendment Act 2023 (LGOIMA) will come into force, introducing changes to the LIM provisions that are specifically tailored to the…

Three-day inspection mandate: well intentioned, but is it well thought out?

In a move designed to improve efficiency and reduce delays in construction projects nationwide, the government has announced a significant new requirement for Building Consent Authorities (BCAs).  Intended to commence from late 2025, BCAs will be required to complete 80 percent of building inspections within three working days of the request. The Government aims to…

30 years on – Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines revamp

30 years on – What does the 2025 revamp of the Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines mean for local authorities? Overview The Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines are fundamental in shaping Aotearoa’s criminal justice system, and they have recently been updated following the most comprehensive review in over 30 years. While the definition of “prosecuting agency” excludes local authorities,…