Council prosecutions: a ‘how to’ guide for serving defendants

One of the core functions of local authorities is prosecuting and enforcing non-compliance with regulatory requirements, such as breaches of the Building Act and/or the Resource Management Act, and under the Dog Control Act.

Once a charge has been laid in the District Court, a defendant needs to be served with the charge, and summonsed. Before the prosecution can proceed, the Court will need to be satisfied that a defendant has been “served”, with the relevant documents, so that the defendant is properly notified of the charge they are facing. The responsibility of serving the defendant is on the Council, as prosecutor.

Rule 2.5 of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2012 sets out how a defendant may be served. Either documents may be served on a defendant by personal service, by sending it to their address for service, or (in the event no address has been provided) by sending it their last known postal address or place or residence or business, or by leaving it with a family member over the age of 18, or by any other method agreed by the parties or approved by the Court or a Registrar.

Usually service is pretty straight forward, and a person, or their lawyer, will accept service. But sometimes it is not.

What if a person runs away every time a process server gets near? What if a person cannot be found? What if a person denies being the defendant (even though they are)? What if a person has no known abode? Sometimes defendants will try to avoid service, to try to prevent or stall a prosecution. These are all situations that we have faced in prosecuting for councils around the country. So, what to do? Surely Joe Bloggs can’t avoid being prosecuted for a serious breach of the RMA, just because he keeps running away from the Council’s process server?

We do not recommend the approach taken by Olivia Wilde’s ex-husband who waited until she was performing on stage in a live event, before serving her with divorce papers…!

But, if the usual means of service have been unsuccessful, thankfully, there are other options to effect service. One option is to apply to the Court for substituted service, being an order for service by another means. This can include service by email, by social media such as through Facebook. Another option may be to serve it on a defendant’s landlord. The Courts have discretion to approve other methods of service.

The Court will want to see proof that the Council has taken reasonable steps to try to effect service. An affidavit of service from the process server setting out a clear record of service attempts is often the best way to demonstrate this.

Councils have important regulatory functions in ensuring compliance with various statutes and upholding and maintaining public, building and environmental standards and safety. Rest assured, even with the most difficult of defendants, there is always a way to satisfy the Court that reasonable attempts to affect service have been made, and that a defendant can’t avoid justice by just running away.

 

Related news

Guidance for Building Consent Authorities in the wake of Cyclone Gabrielle

Natural hazards at a time of significant uncertainty – guidance for Building Consent Authorities in the wake of Cyclone Gabrielle Cyclone Gabrielle was one of the largest natural disasters in the history of Aotearoa New Zealand.  Many North Island councils (as well as some South Island ones) have grappled with how to approach building consenting…

Building Act prosecution of Bella Vista Homes builder / developer finally at an end

The curtains have come down on one of the country’s longest running Building Act prosecutions after the Supreme Court had the final say and declined Danny Cancian’s application to bring a third appeal against his convictions. Background Mr Cancian, along with other defendants, including his company Bella Vista Homes Limited, was charged by Tauranga City…

Alcohol LAPse (pun intended)

Of the 33 provisional local alcohol policies (LAPs) developed since 2017, 32 have been appealed, with the average duration from notification of a provisional LAP to adoption being 790 days! Because of the time and costs involved in fighting these appeals, many councils (representing over 50% of New Zealand’s population) have halted or abandoned the…