Dollar deterrence: bach renovation leads to $17,000 fine

A businessman who renovated an old bach in Abel Tasman was hit with a fine of more than $17,000 for illegal building work.

Rice Speir helped Charlotte Spilman and the team at Tasman District Council to achieve the speedy and cost-effective Building Act prosecution.

After early guilty pleas to eight charges involving illegal building work, the semi-retired Christchurch businessman was sentenced to pay a fine of $17,250.  Ninety percent of the fine will be paid directly to the council, allowing a full recovery of its legal costs.

“90% of the fine will be paid directly to council, allowing recovery of legal costs.”

In sentencing the defendant, Judge David Ruth said that the defendant knew “full well” what his obligations were and chose to ignore them.  He went on to say that “you must be held accountable for what you have done to promote in you a sense of responsibility and to denounce your conduct and deter others from doing it”.

The sentencing, which was reported by Stuff, reinforces a few key messages for our readers:

  • Building Act fines are on the rise, which was the Government’s intention when it doubled the maximum penalty in 2013 from $100,000 to $200,000.
  • Deterring others from doing illegal building work is a key reason to prosecute.
  • If councils don’t prosecute, others won’t be deterred from doing illegal building work and this puts people at risk.
  • The media has a role to play in getting the message out to your community.
  • If done right, councils can recover the cost of prosecuting in some cases.

Related news

Is the balance shifting in alcohol regulation?

Last week, the Government introduced the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (improving Alcohol Regulation) Amendment Bill (Bill). While much of the commentary has focused on the hospitality sector, the changes will be just as significant for local government and District Licensing Committees (DLCs). What the bill does: Narrows the scope for who can object to…

Two reforms, one issue: RMA and Building Act changes for granny flats

From 15 January 2026, two major regulatory changes will take effect that together reshape how detached minor residential units (commonly known as “granny flats”) are delivered in New Zealand: Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units) Regulations 2025 (NES-DMRU) under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA); and Changes to the Building Act…

New councils, new priorities – is it time to review delegations?

With the local government elections now behind us, councils across the motu are working through inductions, briefings, and the first meetings of the new triennium.  It’s a period of adjustment, with new faces around the table and returning members settling back into the rhythm of governance. It’s also an ideal moment to pause and consider…

High Court reinforces importance of minimising alcohol-related harm

The High Court has revoked the off-licence of a bottle store at a contentious South Auckland site following an appeal brought by the Auckland Alcohol Licencing Inspector (Inspector).  The case of Singh 13 Investments Limited [2025] NZHC 2868 concerned a Thirsty Liquor located in Māngere East, a vulnerable community known to have high levels of…