Dollar deterrence: bach renovation leads to $17,000 fine

A businessman who renovated an old bach in Abel Tasman was hit with a fine of more than $17,000 for illegal building work.

Rice Speir helped Charlotte Spilman and the team at Tasman District Council to achieve the speedy and cost-effective Building Act prosecution.

After early guilty pleas to eight charges involving illegal building work, the semi-retired Christchurch businessman was sentenced to pay a fine of $17,250.  Ninety percent of the fine will be paid directly to the council, allowing a full recovery of its legal costs.

“90% of the fine will be paid directly to council, allowing recovery of legal costs.”

In sentencing the defendant, Judge David Ruth said that the defendant knew “full well” what his obligations were and chose to ignore them.  He went on to say that “you must be held accountable for what you have done to promote in you a sense of responsibility and to denounce your conduct and deter others from doing it”.

The sentencing, which was reported by Stuff, reinforces a few key messages for our readers:

  • Building Act fines are on the rise, which was the Government’s intention when it doubled the maximum penalty in 2013 from $100,000 to $200,000.
  • Deterring others from doing illegal building work is a key reason to prosecute.
  • If councils don’t prosecute, others won’t be deterred from doing illegal building work and this puts people at risk.
  • The media has a role to play in getting the message out to your community.
  • If done right, councils can recover the cost of prosecuting in some cases.

Related news

Not above the law: options when faced with a sovereign citizen

As local councils across New Zealand carry out their statutory duties under the Building Act 2004, a growing challenge has emerged in the form of “sovereign citizens.” These individuals typically attempt to deny the legitimacy of government authority and may attempt to frustrate compliance processes—including by refusing entry to property, rejecting compliance action, or disputing…

Natural Hazard Information: what’s changing for LIMs in 2025

Natural hazards are a topical issue, and big changes are on the horizon for how hazard information is communicated in Land Information Memoranda (LIMs). From 1 July 2025, the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Amendment Act 2023 (LGOIMA) will come into force, introducing changes to the LIM provisions that are specifically tailored to the…

Three-day inspection mandate: well intentioned, but is it well thought out?

In a move designed to improve efficiency and reduce delays in construction projects nationwide, the government has announced a significant new requirement for Building Consent Authorities (BCAs).  Intended to commence from late 2025, BCAs will be required to complete 80 percent of building inspections within three working days of the request. The Government aims to…

30 years on – Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines revamp

30 years on – What does the 2025 revamp of the Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines mean for local authorities? Overview The Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines are fundamental in shaping Aotearoa’s criminal justice system, and they have recently been updated following the most comprehensive review in over 30 years. While the definition of “prosecuting agency” excludes local authorities,…