Resource consent granted to remediate the Te Mata Peak walking track

In early 2019, Hastings District Council was granted resource consent to remediate the highly controversial track that was constructed without public notification on the eastern slope of Te Mata Peak in late 2017.

Rice Speir represented the council (in its capacity as applicant) at the two day hearing before Independent Commissioners, Paul Cooney and Rauru Kirikiri.

The construction of the track in 2017 divided the local community.  This was acknowledged by the Commissioners who, in their decision, acknowledged the significant dissention the establishment of the track had created in the Hawkes Bay community:

There were those who supported the track as a public amenity but equally there was a great deal of opposition to it for cultural and landscape reasons.

It was not easy for us as Commissioners to fully appreciate the depth of public opinion underlying this application, particularly from the local Maori community, who felt aggrieved and offended that the track could be established on a non-notified consent basis without any proper consultation with them.  They said they had relied on the District Plan to provide protection for Te Mata Peak as a taonga and outstanding natural feature of the landscape but felt let down that such a situation could occur to their iconic tipuna (ancestor).

At the outset of the hearing, the council acknowledged and apologised profusely to iwi for the cultural offence and hurt that had been caused through the incorrect processing of the 2017 consent.  For the council, it was this apology that underpinned the reason for the application.

Overall, the Commissioners had no reservations in deciding that consent should be granted, finding that, from a Maori tikanga perspective, the granting of the application would go a long way towards rectifying the harm caused by the presence of the track on Te Mata and give proper recognition to the close ancestral relationship tangata whenua have with Te Mata Peak.

With the consented remedial work now underway, it is hoped that the scars caused by the lack of consultation with the local community will soon be healed.

Related news

Is the balance shifting in alcohol regulation?

Last week, the Government introduced the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (improving Alcohol Regulation) Amendment Bill (Bill). While much of the commentary has focused on the hospitality sector, the changes will be just as significant for local government and District Licensing Committees (DLCs). What the bill does: Narrows the scope for who can object to…

Two reforms, one issue: RMA and Building Act changes for granny flats

From 15 January 2026, two major regulatory changes will take effect that together reshape how detached minor residential units (commonly known as “granny flats”) are delivered in New Zealand: Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units) Regulations 2025 (NES-DMRU) under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA); and Changes to the Building Act…

New councils, new priorities – is it time to review delegations?

With the local government elections now behind us, councils across the motu are working through inductions, briefings, and the first meetings of the new triennium.  It’s a period of adjustment, with new faces around the table and returning members settling back into the rhythm of governance. It’s also an ideal moment to pause and consider…

High Court reinforces importance of minimising alcohol-related harm

The High Court has revoked the off-licence of a bottle store at a contentious South Auckland site following an appeal brought by the Auckland Alcohol Licencing Inspector (Inspector).  The case of Singh 13 Investments Limited [2025] NZHC 2868 concerned a Thirsty Liquor located in Māngere East, a vulnerable community known to have high levels of…