What to do when a building owner ignores multiple Notices to Fix?

Thames-Coromandel District Council and Rice Speir lead the way with s 220 of the Building Act 2004

In December 2022 Rice Speir successfully obtained orders authorising Thames-Coromandel District Council to carry out building work (including demolition) after a history of non-compliance with Notices to Fix.  After removing the longstanding problematic buildings, the owner is now liable for the costs of the work and a charge on the property guarantees the Council’s recovery of what it spent.

A copy of the District Court’s decision can be downloaded from our website here: Reserved decision of Judge JL Forrest

Background                                                          

The case involved a hodge podge of unconsented or non-compliant buildings.  Over the years numerous Notices to Fix and Insanitary Building Notices had been issued by the Council. All of the Council’s efforts were ignored and the situation seemingly fell into the too hard basket for the owner.

After Rice Speir became involved, the Council issued a final Notice to Fix encompassing all of the unauthorised building work on the property.  Once the compliance date for that NTF came and went, after giving the necessary 10 days’ notice, the Council applied to the Court under s 220 of the Building Act.

Authorisation to carry out building work

Judge Forrest granted the orders sought by the Council, observing that the Notices to Fix had been issued to the building owner and occupier but had been ignored for a lengthy period of time.  The building owners did not engage with the Court process except to send an informal affidavit to the Court protesting the application.

The s 220 order authorises the Council to carry out building work (including demolition) required to make compliant the building works identified in the final Notice to Fix.

The Council was also granted orders making the owners liable for the actual and reasonable costs of the Council’s authorised building work; and even for its legal costs.

The Building Act enables the Council’s costs to become a charge on the land.  This means that a building owner can’t sell their property until the Council is reimbursed, giving certainty around ratepayer costs.

We are thrilled to have recovered for the Council not only its demolition costs, but also what it spent on legal fees to get there.  A fantastic result that should provide other councils with confidence to tackle those historic compliance issues that may be dangerous, insanitary or just unsightly.

You can only lead a horse to water, you can’t make it drink.  Fortunately for Building Act compliance, the Court is there to help when all else fails.

 

Related news

Not above the law: options when faced with a sovereign citizen

As local councils across New Zealand carry out their statutory duties under the Building Act 2004, a growing challenge has emerged in the form of “sovereign citizens.” These individuals typically attempt to deny the legitimacy of government authority and may attempt to frustrate compliance processes—including by refusing entry to property, rejecting compliance action, or disputing…

Natural Hazard Information: what’s changing for LIMs in 2025

Natural hazards are a topical issue, and big changes are on the horizon for how hazard information is communicated in Land Information Memoranda (LIMs). From 1 July 2025, the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Amendment Act 2023 (LGOIMA) will come into force, introducing changes to the LIM provisions that are specifically tailored to the…

Three-day inspection mandate: well intentioned, but is it well thought out?

In a move designed to improve efficiency and reduce delays in construction projects nationwide, the government has announced a significant new requirement for Building Consent Authorities (BCAs).  Intended to commence from late 2025, BCAs will be required to complete 80 percent of building inspections within three working days of the request. The Government aims to…

30 years on – Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines revamp

30 years on – What does the 2025 revamp of the Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines mean for local authorities? Overview The Solicitor-General Prosecution Guidelines are fundamental in shaping Aotearoa’s criminal justice system, and they have recently been updated following the most comprehensive review in over 30 years. While the definition of “prosecuting agency” excludes local authorities,…