Changes to funding and financing of infrastructure ahead

Recent announcements by the Minister for Housing and Infrastructure, Chris Bishop, could mark a significant shift in New Zealand’s approach to infrastructure funding and financing. Through improvements in the way infrastructure costs are managed and distributed, the Government aims to create a more sustainable and responsive funding model aimed at addressing the ongoing housing crisis.

Councils are presently constrained in the mechanisms available for the recovery of their investment in enabling infrastructure delivery. Chiefly this is through Development Contributions under the Local Government Act 2002.  However, this system, which has long been criticised for its inflexibility and inability to appropriately distribute infrastructure costs, will be replaced by a new Development Levy system. The new system has been indicated to provide more flexibility and ensure that developers contribute fairly to the costs of infrastructure required for new developments.

We all await substantive drafting, but it would seem that the key components of the new Development Levy system include regulatory oversight to ensure the levies are fair and transparent, and the introduction of separate levies for specific types of infrastructure such as drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, and transport. The intent being to create a more equitable distribution of costs and reduce the financial burden on ratepayers, who have historically shouldered a significant portion of these expenses.  Growth historically has not fully contributed to its own growth demand for infrastructure.

Additionally, it has been indicated that the new system will increase flexibility in targeted rates and improve the Infrastructure Funding and Financing Act 2020. Measures again intended to support housing growth by providing councils and other infrastructure providers with the tools they need to recover costs, whether planned and costed or not, and therefore encourage much needed investment. The Government expects this approach to promote the development of land sooner, rather than allowing it to be banked for future use.

The changes are also likely to include the broadening of existing tools to support value capture, which will help ensure that the benefits of infrastructure investment are more widely, and hopefully more equitably, shared.

This all represents a significant shift in New Zealand’s approach to infrastructure funding and financing; and some exciting times ahead in this area.

If you have any additional insights on the above or wish to discuss infrastructure funding across local government, please feel free to get in touch on cori.barkle@ricespeir.co.nz.

Related news

High Court declines application for summary judgment against Council

A high-profile developer has had its application for summary judgment declined by the High Court. The developer sought summary judgment against Christchurch City Council (CCC) in respect of two fire design related defects that it said had caused significant loss.  The developer argued that the council had negligently processed and issued the building consent and…

Not above the law: options when faced with a sovereign citizen

As local councils across New Zealand carry out their statutory duties under the Building Act 2004, a growing challenge has emerged in the form of “sovereign citizens.” These individuals typically attempt to deny the legitimacy of government authority and may attempt to frustrate compliance processes—including by refusing entry to property, rejecting compliance action, or disputing…

The ADLS lease evolves – are you up to date?

In local government there is always a focus on optimising assets; particularly land, which is often the most financially and strategically significant asset held.  However, sometimes the significance of the asset is not fully reflected in the processes and documents used when dealing with it; although a challenge not unique to local government.  A prime…