Congratulations to Charlotta Harpur

We recently announced Charlotta Harpur’s promotion to Associate Director and are now delighted to share more about her impressive career and how she can help you.

Charlotta is a seasoned specialist civil litigation and dispute resolution solicitor, with over 15 years of experience assisting councils in resolving disputes.  Her extensive knowledge of council functions under the Building Act and all aspects of building-related disputes and civil procedures, has made her an integral part of Rice Speir and a sought-after contact for our clients.

Charlotta’s in-depth knowledge of building defect and weathertightness claims is recognised within the industry, with Charlotta’s regularly speaking at BOINZ events and councils across the country.

Charlotta has had multiple significant success in and out of Court for our council clients in the past year.  These include:

Woolley v Marlborough District Council [2023] NZHC 3840: Successful opposition to plaintiff’s application to cross-examine council staff for further discovery and challenge to litigation privilege;

Woolley v Marlborough District Council [2024] NZHC 1647: Successful opposition to plaintiff’s application for discovery of metadata of documents;

Hobday v Selwyn District Council [2024] NZHC 550: Successful opposition to plaintiffs’ application for extension of time to serve the Council, and strike out of claim against Council;

Tasman District Council v Buchanan [2024] NZCA 133: successful Court of Appeal finding of no duty of care by Council when inspecting pools to avoid economic loss to owners.

Charlotta is more than happy to assist with any issues you may face in the civil litigation and building defects area.  You can contact her on 021 030 5344 or charlotta.harpur@ricespeir.co.nz.

Related news

Don’t Wait: Why timely debt recovery matters for local authorities

Debt recovery is an important but often overlooked function of local government.  Councils are responsible for recovering significant sums in unpaid rates, development contributions, lease payments and other debts.  While local authorities have strong statutory recovery tools available, delay can significantly reduce recovery prospects.  Early action often leads to faster, cheaper and more effective outcomes,…

When does a landlord’s repair become an improvement?

What the High Court’s Podium decision means for property owners, landlords and tenants For anyone involved in property leasing, whether commercial or community-orientated, the distinction between a repair and maintenance, and an improvement, matters.  It affects tax treatment, maintenance programmes, lease outgoings recoveries, capital budgeting and, can often result in disputes between landlords and tenants.…

Buyer beware: New liability settings re-allocate the risk of defective building work

On 30 June 2026, the Government introduced the much-anticipated Building Act Amendment Bill including the proposal to move away from ‘joint and several’ to ‘proportionate’ liability for claims relating to building defects. This shift will mean that a party who is liable for a building defect will no longer face the risk of needing to…

Abatement notice update: Court offers clarity on “reasonable” compliance periods

The Environment Court has recently confirmed that a reasonable compliance timeframe is the time required to take the specified step – not the time required to advance a resource consent application.  The Environment Court has recently confirmed that a “reasonable” compliance timeframe in an abatement notice is directed to the practical time needed to cease…